In many countries, the government likes to spend more money on the arts. Some people agree with this. However, others think government should spend more on health and education. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although it is argued that the arts should receive more government spending, I am of the opinion that health and education should be the priority for investment from the state. In this essay, I will discuss both sides and provide my opinion.
On the one hand, increased government spending on the arts brings many benefits that can help enrich society in numerous ways. The arts have the potential to promote cultural exchange, can spread the culture and lifestyle of a country. For example, Dong Ho painting is a type of Vietnamese folk art that portrays various aspects of Vietnamese history, culture, and daily life. Through Dong Ho painting, people from different continents can gain an insight into Vietnamese culture and appreciate its beauty and richness. Another reason of sponsoring arts is it is another source of income for the government. For example, Korea has achieved significant success in the music and film industries. By doing so, Korea has not only shared its culture with the world but has also contributed to its economic development.
On the other hand, I am convinced that government should prioritize investing more money in healthcare and education, which they believe is crucial. By investing in a nation's education and healthcare systems, the standard of living of its citizens can be improved which are essential blocks for a country's wealth. The well-being of human health is paramount, as it not only ensures a sufficient workforce for the city but also leads to the overall development of the country in various areas. Furthermore, the education system also needs financial intervention, as that will birth the leaders of tomorrow. Furthermore, financial intervention in the education system is equally essential. A well-equipped education system can produce capable individuals who contribute positively to society, aid in the development of the country, and potentially become the future leaders of the nation.
In conclusion, while some argued that developing arts by the government is essential, I hold the belief that investing in health and education is more benefit for the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | phatvt1234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-07 | Anhhhhhh | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Elena2509 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 78 | view |
- In many countries the government likes to spend more money on the arts Some people agree with this However others think government should spend more on health and education Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Topic Some people say cultural traditions are destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others say this is the only way to save such traditions Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...y believe is crucial. By investing in a nations education and healthcare systems, the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat will birth the leaders of tomorrow. Furthermore, financial intervention in the educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29203539823 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93070778631 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9999499198 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258843099373 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773979883758 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079134834647 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180971888656 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849527652096 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.