the bar chart gives information about the railway system in six cities in europe
Given is the bar chart depicting the number of Railway system visitors in a variety of stations in Europe, which are established at different times.
Perceptibly, the stations in Lisbon attracted the most passengers in the surveyed period, while Paris owned the oldest railway system.
It is noticeable that Lisbon provided services for roughly 2000 million passengers per year, nearly twice as higher as Stockholm’s, which was constructed in 1900, with nearly 1000 million ones recorded. Simultaneously, Paris’s railway system, despite the earliest construction, merely serves 775 million customers per year.
Regarding the remaining station, the number of passengers who visited the Madrid railway system was the least with only 45 million. Although being constructed in 2001, later than Madrid’s stations, Berlin’s lured more passengers, with 50 million achieved per year. Additionally, constructed in 1976, Rome’s railway system serves a threefold volume of passengers annually, compared to Berlin’s, with 144 million customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 73
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- The chart shows Australian home Internet use by reasons and age groups Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...engers per year, nearly twice as higher as Stockholm’s, which was constructed in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89473684211 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98771144316 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671052631579 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5925690746 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141302223929 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784558169452 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603662043838 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1030205227 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053383797788 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.06136585366 135% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.