Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed that whether money is squanderred to hold huge sport competitions, or the events have positive implications on the host nation. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument, and explain why the gains would overshadow the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the country organizing the events in many dimensions. Large sport festivals open up opportunities for nations to promote their national images to the world. The endorsement not only renders the host regconizable to the rest of the planet, but fosters their soft power, thus facilitates their economic, cultural, social cooperations globally. Another advantage of holding international sporting events is that it spurs sports development. Companies often utilize the reputation of renowned athletes such as Messi, Ussan Bolt for selling their offerings, which makes the moguls allot billion dollars to sponsor for the sports and players. The appearance of such eminent professionals in those major events thus would lure valuable resources to further the progression of sports in general.
On the other hand, there are dark sides of organizing major sport events. The first issue is that the host nation has to bear prodigous expense including new constructions, and refurbishment of available facilities and infrastructures. Despite the huge allocation of resources in advance, it is uncertain that the authorities are able to reap the benefits from the bet. It is not uncommon that the colossal cost of holding such events leaves nations mired down in debt afterwards. Additionally, the influx of foreign visitors may disturb the local ambience. Anomalous beliefs, exotic culture, and lifestyle would place the foreigners at odds with local citizens. This acts as a predecessor for unwanted hostility between local and overseas sport enthusiasts.
In sum, the outcome of spending money on sport events is unclear and the events would hobble the regular routine of local people. However, the organizers are given great chance to introduce their nations to the world and encourage domestic sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | linhchihwg | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are the problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are the solutions for these problems 78
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- There have been many inventions in the human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...offerings, which makes the moguls allot billion dollars to sponsor for the sports and p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45565749235 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95579315009 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599388379205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5892356798 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.941176471 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270466017381 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811311458728 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673845589194 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16423512771 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332850521872 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.