Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the evergreen tree called Torreya taxifolia which are in the condition of extinction. The author the reading proposed mainly three solution for the preservation of Torreya species however the lecturer disagrees. The speaker opposes the idea and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that in order to conserve Torreya trees they need to reestablished in the same location where they used to flourish before that is in microclimate which is normally wetter and cooler.. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contend that due to the global warming, weather has become warmer so growing plant in such dry place strongly affect the plantation.
Secondly, according to the reading another way to protect Torreya is to shift them to diverse loaction far from the northern Florida. This way the seed can be successfully planted. The speaker on other hand points out the example of another plant which once moved to the different area replaced the exixting species . Therefore,this might be the case in moving Torreya plant to different area.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that preserving plant in research center can be the best solution. In addition, this allow scientist to inspect and monitor the plant closely for the continuation of plant survival. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that enough space is required for the survival of Torreya which is not possible in research center. Similarly, plant cannot resist disease within small space. Thus, this idea doesnot seem to be worthy.
As we can see, the author and professor holds very conflicting views on the ways to conserve Torreya taxifolia tree. The speaker effectively challenges the points made in the article.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...species however the lecturer disagrees. The speaker opposes the idea and attacks ea...
^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...mate which is normally wetter and cooler.. The professor believes there are flaws ...
^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'contends'.
Suggestion: contends
... are flaws in the writer’s position. He contend that due to the global warming, weather...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...erent area replaced the exixting species . Therefore,this might be the case in mov...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...eplaced the exixting species . Therefore,this might be the case in moving Torreya pla...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1722972973 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60253461256 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9159709284 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0555555556 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132364342343 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410972789543 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415689819843 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072574481283 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346000144194 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.