Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Sport is one of the most popular topics that people talk about these days. As well as being a healthy activity, it also helps to form a good physical body shape and heal players' mental well-being. Sports played by a team are considered more beneficial than sports played by the player alone. As part of this essay, I will provide a brief opinion about both views, proving that every type of sport has its own advantages.
Speaking of team sports, you can think of numerous popular sports like football, basketball, volleyball. In addition to muscle and mental development, most sports provide motivation for their players. Solidarity and teamwork are the two main goals of nearly all team sports. Playing in a team can enable people to develop social abilities, and it is always more practical for people to cooperate with others in order to achieve the task, which is winning the sport that they play. Team sports require people to get to know each other and develop communication skills through conversations. Moreover, working as a team might also help children develop teamwork skills and know how to divide the work of the whole group. By grouping sports, players will gain many skills that will help them work efficiently in a team environment.
Aside from health and physical benefits, individual sports focus on a totally different field. In contrast with team-up sports, this type of sport is more about concentration. As there is no teammate, you have no one to rely on. In order to win the game, concentration is essential. In individual sports players have to be single-minded in the game that they play because the pace is usually extremely fast. It helps people to acquire the ability to focus for a long period of time, likewise, athletes usually can use this skill to do their daily tasks. As a result, they are productivity and efficiency in every work. Individual sports have unique benefits related to concentration, which are very useful.
In conclusion, both types of sports have different ways to benefit players and cannot be compared. But they all help people to gain health and different skills in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- Organized tours to remote places and communities are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the environment 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... focus on a totally different field. In contrast with team-up sports, this type of sport...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...acquire the ability to focus for a long period of time, likewise, athletes usually can use thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to concentration, which are very useful. In conclusion, both types of sports have...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, speaking of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6693505013 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0830076217 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276808814089 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799642217331 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711299865389 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16350142506 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556865836091 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.