The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the average emissions of carbon dioxide in four countries - the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal - over a period of 40 years.
It is clear that the UK has by far the highest CO2 emissions over the period shown. Portugal, on the other hand, had overall the lowest emissions, although a slow but steady rise can be observed.
In 1967, each inhabitant of the UK produced around 11 metric tonnes of CO2, which was significantly more than people in other regions. Italy and Sweden had average emissions of around 9 and 4.5 respectively. Portugal's residents generated only a negligible amount, just 1 metric tonne per person.
However, the UK saw a decrease in CO2 emissions by 4 metric tonnes per person after 40 years. Sweden's average emissions peaked in 1977 at over 10 metric tonnes and then gradually declined. By contrast, Italy and Portugal both had more CO2 emissions. Italy's emissions surpassed Sweden's after 1987, and in 2007 the emissions of Portugal were at the same level as that of Sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yousefikia | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Trunggg | view |
- The graph below shows an average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide Co2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers What is the cause of this What are some possible solutions 67
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers 67
- Most countries spend much money on education as they start to realize the importance of education In your opinion which two subjects are the most important for young people and which one is the least important 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90229885057 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6267396341 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.615972648 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260440450576 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113710111851 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668882511618 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163173879318 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767536341827 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.