The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that most of mainstream media channels pay too much their attention into the problem as well as urgent issues in society rather than on moveable innovating and this trend is claimed to bring harm to citizens. Due to the fact that this propensity has both beneficial and negative effects. In my perspective, I concur to a certain extent.
First and foremost, it is not a good aspect for people's mental state to be exposed regularly to negative news stories about society. For instance, many people are afraid of travelling abroad due to the terrorism and war news that they gain into social media. In addition to this, many feature within society can also be misunderstood which should be respected and acknowledged. In the reality, with the correct and accurate news provided, a plenty people have made many great contributions to society without any noticeably announcemed.
On the other edge of thoughts, the focus on negative issues rather than positive developments is acceptable to some extent. Firstly, the media can be seen as an effective way to spread the news, to even the most remote areas , and this can help to bring people together in order to solve serious problems. In fact, negative media stories have a higher chance of bringing awareness to the problem and moving people towards action. For instance, cancer news coverage is now a frequent topic in the media, and as a result, many people have adopted healthier lifestyles. This is the impeccable evidence of the advantage that concentrates on negative issues as an appropriate level.
In conclusion, the media should cover all issues, even if there are associated negative consequences. To a matter of fact, I strongly suppose that media coverage must be considered mindfully before being transfer to avoid the misled and distracted information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | pandaree.r | 67 | view |
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 78
- Fewer young people play sports these days why is this What can be done to encourage more young people to do sports 89
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that only small differences between the richest and the poorest members To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feature seems to be countable; consider using: 'many features'.
Suggestion: many features
...into social media. In addition to this, many feature within society can also be misunderstoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the news, to even the most remote areas , and this can help to bring people toget...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08609271523 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78636605447 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7136130083 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151387673778 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531262275535 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447386137193 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902571497664 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035541985603 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.