Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
In such a sophisticated world in which we live, others' helps come to our aid in everyday life and pave the way for confronting our hardships in the face of adversity. Due to its paramount importance, other people assistance, both emotionally and financially, has played a prevailing role in human's life. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among people about whether people nowadays have a more tendency to help other people or not. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that due to such complex world individuals are just concerned about their personal issues and do not help others. Nonetheless, from my own perspective, this statement is false. As a matter of fact, I wholeheartedly disagree with such people and strongly recommend that folks continue their helps to people in need. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons in order to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that as people become more aware of benefits of helping others, they become more enthusiastic about helping others. To shed light on this issue, seldom do not people read books or attend university. As a result, nowadays, majority of people are well-informed and educated folks. Such informed people are better aware of helping's advantages, such as decreasing the number of criminals as a result of annihilating the cycle of poverty and promote mobility. Helping others, therefore, has a myriad of merits for society that majority of citizens know.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that since the ways of making money has been facilitating, more and more people each year become wealthy. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by recent ground-breaking research conducted in our country, indicate that approximately twelve percent of country population get rich and categorize between higher class of the society. On the other hand, this rate just were about two percent in the past. Consequently, people today have more access to great amount of money and are able to dedicate some of the, to charity or poor people.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that in years decades the rate of helping others has been accelerated. It is anticipated that if people of a country help each other, the society will burgeon as a yield of eliminating poverty.
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 83
- It is difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students learn Agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...mount of money and are able to dedicate some of the, to charity or poor people. To wrap i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... money and are able to dedicate some of the, to charity or poor people. To wrap it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14948453608 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98689435522 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5625564734 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326544014662 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971872028185 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699060039585 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178587780408 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070109333093 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.