Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a hotly-debated issue over whether highschool students should be given freedom to evaluate or even be critical of the teaching of their educators, or these rights should be prohibited due to lack of regard and order. While I recognise that these kinds of judgements may provoke disrespect and disorganisation among them, I hold a firm belief that students’ assessment of their teachers should be prioritised, with a view to enhancing academic efficiency.
One predominant reason why this two-way communication may trigger some repercussions is derived from the fact that it will culminate in harsh pedagogical environment. To be more specific, not only may they give negative comments on the curriculum but it is also likely that they could make judgements about their teachers’ personal lives or appearances. As a consequence, it would prompt teenagers to assume that they are superior to their professors. This, coupled with the fact that they tend to be inexperienced and not knowledgeable enough to criticise anybody, will end up in classes being such chaos.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that students should be incentivised to assess teachers’ lessons. The first and perhaps the most persuasive reason is that this measure enable youngsters to make the most of the lectures at school. As a matter of fact, there is no teaching method suitable for all learners, given that they have different levels of understanding. Students, therefore, are held accountable for giving constructive feedbacks about the aspects of teaching they cannot comprehend. In addition, it is even more urgent to complain about teachers’ failure to manage their class. Unequivocally, the onus is on them to deal with students’ low grades and conflicts at school, but without the responsibility to tackle these problems, teenagers will no longer concentrate on their study. Hence, it is vital to express criticism so that teachers can harmonise and raise the learning ambience.
In conclusion, while schools should have limitations to the extent in which students can make evaluations about teachers, it is my reaffirmation that their comments and criticism are of great significance, seeing that they will do wonders for the exellence of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 67
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 44
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32960893855 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14394626464 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9805160294 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175181871709 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603381612776 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394436665802 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113147148566 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269359941519 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.