In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Lately, a new trend of consumers preferring to go to a store which caters to all their needs under one roof rather than visiting individual stores has emerged. This has led to the closure of many micro stores owned by neighbourhood residents. I believe that this is a step towards the right direction.
Firstly, shopping for all the necessary items in one mall or store allows people to save time and utilize the saved time by spending it with their families. This not only allows the shopping to be done in half the time by reducing commute time to different stores but also, allows a person to shop in an effective manner as there is a reduced chance to forget an item. These days, families get to spend less time with one another since parents are usually occupied with their office work and kids are burdened with their school or college assignments. Efficient shopping permits families to spend more quality time together.
Second, big malls often sell their products at a lower cost when compared to other smaller local shops. Most one-stop-shop malls allows shoppers to reduce their bills as bigger malls usually offer various discounts to it's customers that smaller shops are unable to. Attractive discounts and sales are what entices customers the most. The concession prices offered by big departmental stores are unbeatable by local stores.
In conslusion, even though many small shops have closed down in the recent years, bigger malls offer a wide variety of advantage to it's consumers. People wish to finish their shopping in minimum time and look for the best deals to decrease their spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | Radhika Chopra | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | whatever | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | ielts_tony | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-22 | padmaJ | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Falaka14 | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tores but also, allows a person to shop in an effective manner as there is a reduced chance to forget ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best deals to decrease their spending.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94852941176 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46409115948 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.290616055 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.538461538 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288967243627 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099613200749 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728141245538 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175013415769 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823530330757 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.