The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given map illustrates the amount of food and various types of meat utilized in a European nation from 1979 to 2004
Overall, clearly that the highest figures for Chicken throughout the period. In addition, the opposite was true with the fish.
Looking at the map more closely, we can see that the amount of beef consumed by citizens in a European nation was the highest at roughly 218 grams per person per week, after which it experienced a slight decrease to 196 grams per one per week in 1989. It followed by lamb was 150 grams in 1979 and in 1989 this amount of consumption dropped to 100 grams. Meanwhile, standing at 140 grams in 1979, the number of chicken took over the dominance of Lamb and beef, reaching about 200 grams in 1989, while the lowest figure for fish was approximately 60 grams in 1979 and a final decrease to 50 grams in 1989.
In the second half of the period, chicken stood in the leading position, at 250 grams in 2004, while the amount of beef decreased by about 50 grams and 70 grams for lamb at the end of the stage. There was no change for fish compared to 1989
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- explain some of the ways in which human activities are damaging the environment what can the government do to address these problem 56
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 61
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 78
- The chart below shows the number of internet users in three difference countries anh the world average between 1998 and 2013 84
- Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Others however disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in a European nation from 1979 to 2004 Overall, clearly that the highest figure...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42156862745 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29084734226 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5068951973 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102333064321 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612711217524 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346787274398 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792184046459 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526606213045 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.95 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.