The bar chart illustrates five different industries' percentage share of Brazil's economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029.
The bar graph demonstrates the composition of five industrial sectors in the economy of Brazil over a 30-year period from 2009 to estimation in 2029.
In general, finance is forecast to be the most successful business in Brazil throughout the timeline. An interesting point is that apart from the finance firms, the share of the other 4 sectors will not have improved by 2029.
Looking at the details, in 2009, finance ranked first with about 30% involvement in the Brazilian economy. The figure went up over 35% in 2019 after which it is set to peak at over 40% in 2029. On the other hand, manufacturing went the opposite trend. It underwent a moderate fall from around 20% to 15%. Projections show that the data will decrease by 3 times to just 5% in 2029. This paralleled the downfall of tourism, going down by approximately 5% in the first decade after which it will stay constant.
In contrast, there will be no change in the 2 remaining industries. There were rises in the stakes of food processing and oil, coal, and gas production by around 10% and 5% respectively. However, it is highly predicted that in 2029, the share of the aforementioned businesses will remain the same as the initial value in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | minhhh123 | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | huynh truc mai | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-11 | Aung | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 81 | view |
| 2022-01-26 | Ruxsora | 82 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 78
- The graph below shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
- In many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...same as the initial value in 2009.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, apart from, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79812206573 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78487268666 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.025415209 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207760347771 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615472506655 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750072238053 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132079901618 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822165454245 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.