Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Whether music can connect people of various cultures and generations is open to debate. From my perspective, I am fully in favour of this view, and I will argue for my approval in my following essay.
Cited as the most well-based supporting ground for the view of music linking people globally, music has the essence of a language of human emotions. All peoples began playing music and understanding this universal language many moons ago. We may not understand the lyrics, but the mood and nuances that the music expresses are still easily understood through the miraculous interpretation of the same souls. Regarding people's generations, it is also an implicitly acknowledged fact that music has no age despite having existed since ancient times. Many pieces of music created long ago have melodies having such a strong emotional impact that they are timeless in value, breaking down barriers of the times to reach the young. A similar can occur in some musical artworks produced in the modern era that can attract the taste of music enthusiasts of older ages owing to touching their hearts.
Another compelling argument for music bringing all kinds of people together is that it can play a global educational role besides being entertaining. While rhythm can touch any soul regardless of ethnicity or generation, as mentioned, it is lyrics that can carry weight with human beings in terms of thinking. As music listeners, people may enjoy foreign musical performances conveying various unique cultural aspects of their origins, which allows them to broaden their horizons and have a closer connection to other nations. They can relish songs representing the international voice on a specific issue, which Earth Song by Micheal Jackson is among, proving the power of music to reach national boundaries. Furthermore, there are musical artworks that transmit socially acceptable traditional values of the country from an up-to-date perspective through a harmonious combination between folk and contemporary art materials and the creative thinking of modern-generation artists, which can strengthen the social closeness between people of different ages.
In conclusion, it is perfectly acceptable that music can link human beings from all over the world, whatever people and generation they belong to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 86
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 69
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 63
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual well being What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34710743802 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88356728227 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625344352617 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2592350389 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.642857143 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218151446507 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813218374769 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479796319718 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127134048293 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362339698437 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34710743802 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88356728227 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625344352617 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2592350389 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.642857143 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218151446507 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813218374769 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479796319718 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127134048293 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362339698437 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.