Topic: It’s true that people don’t have time to cook anymore
During the fast-moving modern life, the common belief is that time constraints prevent people from cooking anyway. However, cooking, a necessary skill that nurtures well-being needs to be incorporated into daily routines. Therefore, I contend that even in the face of time constraints, people can and should carve out time to engage in this invaluable practice.
It can be clearly seen that there are several reasons why I disagree with the notion mentioned above. First of all, cooking allows individuals to have control over their meals and reach healthier choices. By preparing meals at home, people can select fresh factors, and avoid using amounts of additives and salt. This not only promotes better nutrition but also contributes to long-term well-being. Additionally, cooking provides an opportunity for creativity and self-expression. Trying new recipes, experimenting with flavors, and developing cuisine skills can be a source of joy and personal fulfillment. Moreover, cooking can be a cost-effective alternative to eating out and relying on processed foods, helping individuals save money in the long run. Overall, by making time for cooking, people can gather the physical, and emotional it offers.
While some argue that busy schedules and demanding lifestyles hinder the ability to cook, counter-arguments actually support the case for prioritizing cooking. A common point raised is the convenience of fast food and ready-made meals, which are seen as time-saving alternatives Yet, it is important to acknowledge the negative health implications of relying on these options. Another one is the cost associated with cooking, with proper planning and budgeting such as buying in bulk, and utilizing seasonal produce, cooking at home can be more affordable. Thus, it becomes clear that making time for cooking benefits both health and finances.
In conclusion, despite the common belief about lack of time to cook, it is undeniable that cooking offers health benefits, social connections, and more than what people imagine. It is time to dispel the misconception and encourage cooking as a rewarding and essential part of people’s lives.
- Topic Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations 70
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The natural resources such as oil forests and freshwater are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 89
- Topic The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life 89
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'offers'' or 'offer's'?
Suggestion: offers'; offer's
... to cook, it is undeniable that cooking offers health benefits, social connections, an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, anyway, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51807228916 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03037197452 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629518072289 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4371907679 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.764705882 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233944887547 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782022395257 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663228968839 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162062963351 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555352425404 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.