In many countries, more and more young people are unable to find jobs after graduation. What are the possible reasons for this change? what are the solutions for this?
It has been known that there are many countries which have gotten demographic bonus. That is demonstrated by number of young people. The growth of young is a good opportunity for state to get economic advantage. However, it would be a big problem of state when failing to utilize the asset. Many young People are going to be difficulty to find work, especially after graduation from university.
One of the reasons which could be happened is limited competency of undergraduates. There are no few alumni of university who do not satisfy requirements to apply job in company. A lot of big corporations would like to hire experienced employee than fresh graduates. Indeed, it will bring trouble for young people and country. Another cause that they get difficulty to work because of limited job vacancy. Fluctuated economic condition has effect to corporation having to fire many employees. Recently there are a lot of information from news has reported especially about start-up companies laying off their employees. It will be complicated issue that many companies do firing, moreover there are many alumni of university have not got work yet. Therefore, the issue must be resolved immediately.
There are several approaches to resolve the problem. The thing could be done by individuals through joining work training from corporation or provided institute. They could learn about skills which is needed to work. In addition, young people are able to start their own business through cooperating to get capital or their own financial capital. Government also needs to provide coaching and holding funding.
To sum up, it is evident that although a number of factors are resulting in an increased undergraduate problem. Solution to tackle the problem are available to governments and individuals. I think it should be resolved as soon as possible to avoid the potential danger to human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 56 | view |
- Comparison of Energy Production
- In many countries more and more young people are unable to find jobs after graduation What are the possible reasons for this change what are the solutions for this 56
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 73
- In many countries more and more young people are unable to find jobs after graduation What are the possible reasons for this change what are the solutions for this 56
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, i think, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90732149275 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5632931811 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6363636364 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9090909091 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141366932795 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387106406413 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500218075426 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832154319215 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620896389454 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, i think, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90732149275 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5632931811 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6363636364 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9090909091 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141366932795 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387106406413 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500218075426 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832154319215 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620896389454 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.