"In any enterprise, the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product."
I definitely agree with the idea that the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product. Any product that a company makes stems from an idea.
A thought which took birth in an individual's subconscious mind that slowly surfaced enough for the 'cognito' mode of the brain to identify. Once this seed is planted, it's germination begins. From germination to its holistic development, it goes through different cycles that challenge its survival.
In the sense of a product, let's take an example of a software company that is trying to design an app that helps you be more effective throughout the day. The app's development begins with the production of a prototype, which is then evolved with continuous developments. As we're moving ahead on this course of plan, we might encounter different obstacles that challenge the nature of our idea. We might be forced to take up an alternative option or we might be forced to change the idea altogether. The conclusion here is that acing every step of the process is crucial. As that is what will help us in identifying the fault lines and fix them. If the process of creation is adulterated, its effects will manifest in the final output. This will eventually lead us back to the point we've been desperately trying to avoid.
Not fixing problems in the process and not learning from mistakes already made isn't an optimized way to move ahead. If the problem persists, it will cost the enterprise more time, money, and manpower. But if these points are taken care of and the process is diligently followed, we might just end up with a superior product. That's because the imagination and problem-solving potential of a human brain is limitless.
To support this argument, I'd like to present an idea from this self-help book called "grit" authored by Angela Duckworth. It's second nature of enterprises to compare the effectiveness of a process by equating it to terms like profit and loss. Angela is a psychologist who interviewed multinational billion dollar companies and their CEO's to understand what lead them there. All had a single answer in common, which was grit. A powerful blend of passion and perseverance. Companies who focused on passionately building their products by following in love with the process were found to be more successful that those who designed mediocre products and capitalized on mass sales. Working through the process also helps you be equipped with foresight as to what all problems may arise in the near future and which aspect of their creation will need assistance.
This ability helps them provide the required services to their customer base and fosters a harmonious bond between them. So, with all these points in mind, we understand that process matters more than the end result. Some learnings might seem to be hidden between the intricacies of step 4 and step 5 but surely they'd get you your "voila!" moment when it will present itself in a shapeshifted form. All these disciplinary practices will lead the enterprise to even greater heights than the predefined ones.
Therefore we conclude that: In any enterprise, the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Falak | 65 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Falak | 65 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | shubham shah | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | PraveenaKan | 66 | view |
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product 65
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
... idea. A thought which took birth in an individuals subconscious mind that slowly surfaced ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'apps'' or 'app's'?
Suggestion: apps'; app's
... more effective throughout the day. The apps development begins with the production ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 783, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
...ll eventually lead us back to the point weve been desperately trying to avoid. No...
^^^^
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...not learning from mistakes already made isnt an optimized way to move ahead. If the ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ht just end up with a superior product. Thats because the imagination and problem-sol...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...imitless. To support this argument, Id like to present an idea from this self-...
^^
Line 10, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'd
...icacies of step 4 and step 5 but surely theyd get you your 'voila!' moment ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 319, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'get' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...s of step 4 and step 5 but surely theyd get you your 'voila!' moment when...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...er heights than the predefined ones. Therefore we conclude that: In any enterprise, th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 28.8173652695 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 55.5748502994 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2725.0 2260.96107784 121% => OK
No of words: 541.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03696857671 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88343878646 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 204.123752495 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523105360444 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 705.55239521 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.755914015 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9655172414 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6551724138 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.86206896552 5.70786347227 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308822041595 0.218282227539 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847391656406 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162310759093 0.0701772020484 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231550581825 0.128457276422 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.251549627443 0.0628817314937 400% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 98.500998004 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.