In the future nobody will buy printed books or newspapers because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

In the future, nobody will buy printed books or newspapers because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying?
To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is believed that in the foreseeable future, ebooks will be substituted for printed books and newspapers. From my perspectives, I am totally in agreement with this viewpoint.
In the first place, ebooks offer a diversity of resources without paying fees. In other words, in the era of technological devices, people can have instant access to ranges of materials online which are free or surprisingly cheap compared to printed books or newspapers. As a result, ebooks and online materials are absolutely well suited for people who are cheapskate or are still financially dependent on their parents. Take Vietnamese high school students as an illustration, the majority of pupils opt for online resources instead of books due to its free sources.
However, it is undeniable to say that reading ebooks is the root cause of eye-related diseases, particularly eye strain and short-sightedness. Consequently, many ebook producers have manufactured a variety of ebook machines which can solve this concern. One of the most popular ebook brands, Kindle is a perfect example for this matter. This brand's latest products are promoted to be equipped with non-blue light, which gives readers a sense of reading a real book despite the fact that what they are reading is actually an ebook. Besides, readers can change word forms suitable for their eyes. As a consequence, they are no longer concerned about eye-related illnesses when using ebooks. As opposed to ebooks, printed books and newspapers are sometimes considered unhealthy for the eyes. To be more specific, many producers tend to print books or newspapers in small texts which are often hard to read.
In conclusion, people nowadays prefer reading ebooks and online resources because of its cheapness and free sources which are a disadvantage of printed books and newspapers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-24 hahoaan 78 view
2024-11-06 Nguyen Thinh 56 view
2024-10-11 bigbuu97 73 view
2023-12-05 Daniel3003 61 view
2023-11-28 huynguyen3726 56 view
Essays by user Đặng Luân :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s are absolutely well suited for people who are cheapskate or are still financially dep...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'brands the latest'.
Suggestion: brands the latest
...a perfect example for this matter. This brands latest products are promoted to be equipped wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, however, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27397260274 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96107543365 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578767123288 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5287851977 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215380038925 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711917238964 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526022209109 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133071012447 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336737464345 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s are absolutely well suited for people who are cheapskate or are still financially dep...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'brands the latest'.
Suggestion: brands the latest
...a perfect example for this matter. This brands latest products are promoted to be equipped wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, however, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27397260274 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96107543365 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578767123288 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5287851977 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215380038925 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711917238964 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526022209109 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133071012447 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336737464345 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.