Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is sometimes argued that people are only keen on difficult hobbies. I disagree with this statement for the following reasons.
On the one hand, challenging hobbies might seem exciting for the sense of satisfaction people have when they manage to do them successfully. Human nature is to feel fascinated when facing a challenge and being forced to come up with solutions to overcome this. Hence, it is reasonable that activities requiring advanced skill and knowledge provide a certain degree of satisfaction. Film editing is an example of a leisure activity that demands arduous work. In my case, it took me over two years to become a professional film editor. However, it is worth my effort and time, and I enjoy it much more than my first time editing a video.
On the other hand, hobbies do not need to be hard to be enjoyed by the majority of the public. Numerous easy activities have the same efficiency in relaxation as hard ones. Many people, especially juveniles, consider surfing the Internet and interacting via social media platforms exciting, and obviously, these require little equipment and are easy to do. Another point worth considering is that having a difficult hobby sometimes causes more stress rather than relieves it. Some activities require both inborn talent and persistent practice, which means that no matter how hard people try, it is possible that they cannot complete the difficulty level of a game.
In conclusion, although difficult hobbies might provide a certain degree of relaxation, hobbies do not need to become hard.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-11-17 nhub2409785 56 view
2024-09-18 wholemilk 67 view
Essays by user pwlihnkt :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07003891051 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75697889744 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7408975484 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233890886675 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710217356263 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953654857178 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128553313531 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405276815032 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.