The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010
The bar chart compares information on fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, Slovakia has the highest rate, while the EU average is also high but not equal. Greece has a low interest rate, while Australia has an equal interest rate.
The rate of fuel used in the transportation sector in Slovakia was near 9% in 2009. There were two countries that had an equal rate: France and Spain. After that, the average rate in the EU was quite high at 7%. But the country of Greece had a lower rate of more than 1%. In contrast, the rate of fuel used in the transportation sector in Slovakia has more than doubled since 2009, reaching 19.5% in 2018. This is higher than the average rate in the EU, which stands at 16%. Meanwhile, Greece's rate has also risen, but still remains much lower at around 4%.
In 2010, Slovakia also had the highest rate of unemployment, more than 6%. There were high rates of 5% in Australia and Italy, the EU average and Besies, the EU average. But, Greece still had a low unemployment rate of 2%.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 84
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 56
- Many employers believe that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succeed in a job so they are employing people who are with good social skills To what extent do you agree or disagree job 71
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 61
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52736318408 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40856659442 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3681886774 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275427436662 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126782790042 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176963920057 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253144853254 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255281583412 0.0819641961636 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52736318408 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40856659442 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3681886774 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275427436662 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126782790042 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176963920057 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253144853254 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255281583412 0.0819641961636 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.