many young people nowadays change their jobs or career every few years. What are the causes? Do its advantages outweight its disadvantages?
Nowadays, it is becoming the norm for youngsters to alter their jobs frequently. From my perspective, this trend, which could be attributed to two main reasons, brings about more upside than downside.
To begin with, the regular change of jobs stems from the desire to change the conditions of many youngsters. That is to say, job hoppers find their current work not conducive to their goals or targets, therefore they modify to another job to seek higher salaries, better perks, colleagues, and supervisors, to name but a few. Another reason why young workers change jobs is that they cannot find a niche in their recent work. This, in turn, makes them lose their morale and demotivate their productivity. In the long run, they may even end up having a dead-end job without any work satisfaction should they not change their jobs immediately. More seriously, this could put workers under extreme stress and pressure, inducing unstable mental health.
On the one hand, hopping jobs every few years may wreak havoc on certain corporations. There is no denying the fact that staff leaves their companies on the grounds that those enterprises have not fulfilled their personnel’s satisfaction to some certain extent. Hence, were those corporations not to modify their schemes to meet workers’ demands, they would end up going bankrupt. Consequently, the whole economy of a country may be in deep trouble, as some young entrepreneurs will not dare to establish their enterprises for fear of bankruptcy.
Despite the disadvantage aforementioned, I am inclined towards the idea that the good done by changing jobs frequently outweighs the harm done because of its remarkable pros. First and foremost, it stands to reason that hopping jobs does wonders for their curriculum vitae. Obviously, working in various careers, the young can gain extensive experience and hands-on insight in wide-ranging fields, which makes them well-rounded. As a result, by mentioning the experience and achievements they have attained in a variety of jobs, young people can build up a glamorous and excellent CV, augmenting their chances of entering prestigious companies. Consequently, all the significant merits of those corporations such as high salaries, incentive schemes, and complimentary insurance accrue to those young workers. This is the most important reason, as sticking to one main job does not assure such benefits. Another advantage of changing jobs is that young workers can extend their social circles. Without a doubt, working in many jobs allows them to socialize with people from all walks of life, or even befriend professional predecessors and senior workers. Thus, whenever youngsters have to undergo hardships and shoulder enormous burdens, they can turn to these friends to find solace and ask for support. Meanwhile, having only one job does not facilitate a wider social network.
In conclusion, it is justifiable that changing jobs frequently is harmful to a certain extent, however, I hold the firm belief that its disadvantages pale in comparison with its advantages
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 89
- Some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 73
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- The increasingly wide use of computers in education has decreased the importance of teachers roles in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91290244805 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 176.041082164 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561475409836 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1054012203 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.043478261 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5652173913 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281278462191 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797089123204 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620862040379 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155413566602 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664378887549 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.