Some people claim that employers should not be concerned about the way employees dress, but only about the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary era, it is a school of thought that holds that employees should not prioritize job performances over dress codes. From my perspective, I partially concur with this opinion.
One of the primary rationales for my belief is that with some jobs that do not require communicating face-to-face with customers, the clothes styles should not be strictly controlled. Furthermore, in this situation, enterprises may need to forge an open environment, aiming for the utmost comfort for the staff members in order to enhance their work productivity. Illustrative of it is Google, one of the largest companies which provides people with search engines, they encourage people to wear casual clothes to work. Not only does it alleviate the image of the enterprise but it also offers incentives for people to strive to work since they have been given many virtues. However, it is worth noting that if what an individual wears is deemed too obscene, they will probably be restricted.
On the other hand, I believe that there is a great variety of upfront jobs that workers should wear based on the standard. For instance, the way a business dresses while contacting to sign contracts will leave either a good or bad impression with a counterparty. Besides, dressing appropriately may also impact detrimentally on multifaceted aspects. It is by courtesy of the influences of it on individuals through the relationships of clients and partners and the reputation of companies through the comments on the outfits of workers.
In conclusion, I’m partly in favor of the idea that employees should not be focused on their clothes but work efficiency since allowing what people want to wear can make people comfortable and also there are jobs that do not require in-person communication. Nevertheless, it should be noticed that with the other works, people may have to wear more formally to show respect and responsibility.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- ok
- Some people claim that employers should not be concerned about the way employees dress but only about the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of money To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1821086262 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04158052961 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0921206749 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20257883966 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648762814624 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502393698572 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118233885909 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571001563851 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.