People aim to achieve balance between their work and lives
Why?
How to overcome it?
In contemporary society, many people’s intentions are to maintain harmony between their professional and personal lives. This phenomenon begs the question of what might be the principal causes and how to resolve its repercussions.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the contributors to such an increasing trend vary from intrinsic factors, namely a self-awareness of its negative outcomes, to extrinsic factors, such as the influence of social networks, which guide people to change their lifestyle. Firstly, in terms of intrinsic factors, many are well aware of the various unfavorable impacts of the unbalanced lifestyle when they have been suffering overwhelming and depressing feelings, which severely affect not only their productivity but also their mental health. Secondly, the subtle influence of social networks should not be overlooked as people tend to be affected by their surrounding environment. If people are surrounded by those who perceive that achieving work-life balance is of paramount importance, the likelihood of us sharing the same insight would gradually increase.
Nevertheless, nothing is unresolvable if appropriate and proper approaches are taken into account, two of which I find the most effective and noteworthy. The first one is to list out things that need attention and set priorities for each. To be more specific, the practice of attempting to tackle the most urgent tasks might prevent us from feeling overloaded as we are fully aware of when to spare no effort. Another striking measure is to set low expectations as it might result in unsatisfaction preventing us from achieving fulfillment in our lives. The important thing is to know when enough and start to spend quality time reinforcing our cement relationship and recharging our battery.
In conclusion, no matter what causes us to achieve work-life balance, it is true that its repercussions are significantly profound. However, setting priorities for our workload and lowering our expectations are likely to be optimal solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | giathuan1305 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | LenhungSpeakingandWriting | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48407643312 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1633423073 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6483107682 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161839369177 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520852155417 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540885483705 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930470547159 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580077006667 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.