Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there has been a growing debate concerning funds invested in advancing space technology. Many hold the belief that when governments put meticulous attention and financial sponsorship on finding extraterrestrial life by producing new technologies, it is a money-squandering way although there are several opportunities to put that money to more beneficial use. From my standpoint, I partially disagree with this notion, and I will provide explanations throughout the course of this essay to support my viewpoint.
Undoubtedly, there are several merits when it comes pouring money into space research technology. One prominent benefit is that the evolution of space technology has satisfied human’s desire for adventure and exploration. In fact, cosmonauts fulfill their desire when they could discover the mysteries of the universe. Another positive feature is that as humans are destroying their own planet, the quest for a new homeland in the universe is essential. To extend, the evolution of space technology has found many extraterrestrial life planets: Kepler 186f, Proxima Centauri b, Teegarden b, Kepler 452b, Kepler 1649 c, Gliese 667Cc, etc,… Hence, this has an implication for rights of using pecuniary resources in space exploration.
However, a counter argument is that technological innovations produce no instant benefits for humans. There is little doubt that there are many current alarming issues such as education, epidemics or climate change that should also receive meticulous attention so that human life can sustain long enough until a suitable planet is detected successfully. Therefore, under no circumstances, the government should prioritize urgent issues that could be solved and bring immediate results over unwarranted spending on advancing space technology.
In conclusion, the debate regarding whether to plough money into universe research or spend this money on valuable usage has been ongoing. Personally, I agree that developing space exploration apparatus has numerous potential advantages. However, I am in favor that the government needs to give top priority to matters that are urgently solved-money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 89
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school In contemporary society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...invested in advancing space technology. Many hold the belief that when governments put me...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...r 452b, Kepler 1649 c, Gliese 667Cc, etc,… Hence, this has an implication for righ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7701863354 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17988159012 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624223602484 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8563438748 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249106128449 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756915818588 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522786237521 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14364361459 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629360073847 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.