Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on other important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Whether food science and culinary courses are important or not is still a topic of discussion. While some argue that students should learn about food and how to cook it, others believe they should focus on other essential subjects. This essay will explore both perspectives and present my strong agreement with the former viewpoint.
On the one hand, opponents of students learning food science emphasize the superior importance of academic subjects and other practical skills. There are core subjects like math and literature that are the dominant factors that determine whether students can get admission to their dream university with an excellent academic transcript, subsequently influencing their career path. Hence, it is reasonable that juveniles, as students, have to spend a large proportion of their day on them. Additionally, cooking is not the only crucial practical skill, students also have to learn how to manage their own budgets and clean the house to be able to live independently from their parents when they reach adulthood.
On the other hand, food science and cooking are still essential for students. According to a recent report, over 20 percent of children have to face obesity due to bad eating habits. The main reason behind this phenomenon is that they are not aware of the amount of nutrition they consume and cannot balance their intake of vegetables and sugary foods. This means that if students learn about food science and the nutritional pyramid, they are likely to eat more healthily, and the number of occasions on which they have to make an appointment with their nutrition doctors can decrease. Another point worth considering is that if students are proficient in cooking, they can avoid the potential threat of food poisoning. If people do not know how to cook, they have no choice but to consume readily available food in the fridge made by their parents or purchase processed meals from stores. These foods are not fresh and sometimes contain certain harmful chemicals due to the dubious activities of the sellers to make the food look delicious as long as possible.
In conclusion, while there are numerous vital pieces of knowledge students have no possibility of avoiding, a solid understanding of food science and cooking cannot be ignored. It is recommended that schools incorporate culinary courses into their curriculum to offer a more comprehensive education for students.
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21173469388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72219458278 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1049877222 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6875 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225045996366 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078640776175 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803501793198 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151161458009 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079625823808 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21173469388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72219458278 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1049877222 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6875 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225045996366 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078640776175 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803501793198 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151161458009 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079625823808 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.