In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss

Essay topics:

In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars.First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiry fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. Like Earth bacteria, the meteorite fossils aretube-like and segmented (i.e, composed of little segments or sections).Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Thee compounds are molecules with guite acomplicated structure. On Earth such compounds often arise when simple organisms like bacteria decompose Thus the best explanation of the compounds on themeteorite is that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars.Thirc. researchers discovered crains of macnette la maanetic mineral) in the meteorte that are similar to macnetite crains produced by bacteria on Earth. Earthbacteria use such maonetic grains as a sort of compass to navicate their movement using Earth's macnetic feld. The grains on the Martian meteorite are vensimiar in size. shape. and stucture to those proouced oy Earth bacteria. which makes it likey that they have been oroduced by bacteria on Mars.

The lecture and the passage discuss whether there is some living forms on Mars or not. In the passage, it gives three discoveries about this topic, but in the lecture, all of them are controdicted by three reasons.

To start with, the author suggests that people can see some small fossils on the meteorite that is similar to the shape of bacteria on Earth. However, the lecturer refutes the argument and claims that the small fossils are just look like the living things on Earth. With different direction to view these fossils, they may change and they are not in proportion.

Moreover, the reading part mentions that some chemical compounds found in the meteorite exist the bacterial origin. Nevertheless, the listening part challenges that they might be the something relevant with volcano because there are a huge amount of volcanos on Mars.

Lastly, the article illustrates that researchers find a magnetic mineral in the meteorite that is the same as the magnetite grains appeared on Earth. The lecture cast doubt on it and argues that the magnetic field on Mars is weak, so that the bacteria cannot follow it. Therefore, this discovery is useless and there is no living sources on Mars.

To sum up, the lecture is undermined by all discoveries of the passage.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 85 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 78 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 83 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sheraleelyle :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...t with volcano because there are a huge amount of volcanos on Mars. Lastly, the ar...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, to start with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54709667273 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572093023256 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0301331697 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8181818182 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117516424322 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041663858434 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535428407108 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525035821637 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291478876248 0.0443174109184 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.