In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss

Essay topics:

In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars.First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiry fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. Like Earth bacteria, the meteorite fossils aretube-like and segmented (i.e, composed of little segments or sections).Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Thee compounds are molecules with guite acomplicated structure. On Earth such compounds often arise when simple organisms like bacteria decompose Thus the best explanation of the compounds on themeteorite is that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars.Thirc. researchers discovered crains of macnette la maanetic mineral) in the meteorte that are similar to macnetite crains produced by bacteria on Earth. Earthbacteria use such maonetic grains as a sort of compass to navicate their movement using Earth's macnetic feld. The grains on the Martian meteorite are vensimiar in size. shape. and stucture to those proouced oy Earth bacteria. which makes it likey that they have been oroduced by bacteria on Mars.

The reading passage found some characteristic of the meteorite suggested that there is life-forms on Mars. But, in the lecture, the professor argues that those point are not convincing.

First, the reading passage asserts that the tiny fossils on the meteorite have similar shape to the Earth one's under an electronic microscope. However, the professor in the lecture contends that eventhough it looks like Earth bacteria, it's just a misleading. This is because the sample will change shape when we look at it through the electronic microscope, and related to the sample preparing.

Secondly, the reading passage maintains that there are some comppounds in the meteorite that appear to be bacterial origin, becasue those compounds often arise from descomposition. Nevertheless, the professor argues that those compounds are not come from decomposition, it may also come from the other activity. For example, the volcanic activity will make the same complex structure as descomposed one.

Third, the reading passage states that the magnetic grain on the Martin meteorite is similar in size, shape, and structure to the Earth bacteria, which could also have the same function as the Earth ones. However, the professor thinks that the magnetic grain will work because the magnetic field on Earth is strong enough for those grain to navigate. But the magnetic field of Mars is weak, those grains is useless on the conditions. They are bable to navigate because of some other non-living sources.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 85 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 78 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 83 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sheraleelyle :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though it looks like Earth bacteria, its just a misleading. This is because the s...
^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...it looks like Earth bacteria, its just a misleading. This is because the sample will change...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this grain' or 'those grains'?
Suggestion: this grain; those grains
...tic field on Earth is strong enough for those grain to navigate. But the magnetic field of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32773109244 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73083385977 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.729204903 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125853468369 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514193098511 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076901925399 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896486883948 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553989253359 0.0443174109184 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.