When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, the priority of remuneration has often been a bone of contention. A prevalent assertion exists that salary, above other factors, is the most recognisable feature of a desirable job. I partially concur with this belief regarding the merits of being well-paid that this discourse will expound on.
To begin with, it is irrefutable that payment is elemental in every job, strongly affecting people’s choice of an occupation, a company, or a position. This perspective is comprehensible as a good income offers employees much better living conditions, namely freedom and financial security, by providing a multitude of choices, thereby enabling them to live where they want, fulfill their needs, and indulge in their interests. Furthermore, a high salary also exerts pressure and motivation on some, making them work harder, and dedicate themselves to their jobs, thus remarkably boosting their performance; in turn, these workers are more able to yield fruitful results than those with low pay.
However, earnings will engender negative effects if put in top priorities. For instance, some people are obsessed with monetary gain and make too much effort to succeed in their business, abandoning other facets regarding health, social relationships, etc. Consequently, they will suffer work pressure and nervous breakdown as a result of long-term overworking. Moreover, people should take some factors other than remuneration into consideration before taking a job, for example, the working environment or business terms and conditions. Ultimately, applicants will build a successful and steady career if they acknowledge these aspects.
In closing, deeming work pay’s crucial role, I agree that it is a predominant part of a job. Meanwhile, it is advisable for workers to control salary’s influence on themselves, hence avoiding worrisome issues and succeeding in their jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and how do 89
- Some people say that Money has universal power Do you agree with this opinion 89
- In an era of globalization some people think that studying abroad is the best way to attain a well paid job while others believe other options are better Discuss both views and give your opinions 95
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and how do 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60207612457 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05919144791 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688581314879 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3647412145 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745533156442 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266767299933 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342458526641 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500675997564 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255742884306 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.