Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that only politicians need to take responsibility for environmental protection. In my opinion, the responsibility to protect the environment should not fall upon politicians alone because ordinary citizens can make a significant contribution.
Firstly, politicians enact stricter laws in order to protect the environment. For instance, cut down the emissions from private vehicles which pollute the air in big cities. Indeed as the cost per kilometer increases, commuters might also turn to more cost-effective and greener means of transportation such as electric bikes,.. Moreover, the government can reduce the overuse of plastic products by imposing new laws that ban all plastic packaging. However, this solution might only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issue. In fact, the causes of pollution are diverse.
On the other hand, I believe that a small impact can make a huge change, an ordinary person can contribute to change the environmental issues. For example, in many schools, students are taught about the environment at an early age, this allows them to raise awareness about the global environment issues and also the people around them. Launching a global campaign, holding press conferences and inviting experts to share information about the concern toward environmental problems.
In conclusion, while some maintain that environmental protection should be done only by the politicians, I believe the best way to protect the environment is when residents and politicians take action together. In the future, it is predicted that more people will understand the importance of environmental protection and take action with other people.
- Nowadays more and more women decide to have children later in their life why Does the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 84
- Question The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- People who lige in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life What are the main problems people in cities face and how can these problems be tackled 73
- Discuss the advantages and disadvatages of working from home 73
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...es which pollute the air in big cities. Indeed as the cost per kilometer increases, co...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...of transportation such as electric bikes,.. Moreover, the government can reduce th...
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...f transportation such as electric bikes,.. Moreover, the government can reduce the...
^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
... the global environment issues and also the people around them. Launching a global campaign, holding p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63035019455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16445534807 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.131628658 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153397848358 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556047507011 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497294721042 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993887903231 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425830524331 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.