Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different opinions regarding the question of severe retributions for driving violations. While some people argue that to reduce the frequency of traffic accidents, measures should be taken to improve road safety, I believe it can also be combined with other methods to solve the problem.
There are numerous reasons why strict punishments can deal with traffic offenses, one of which is to hit people's finances. More specifically, fine people when they break the law will raise their awareness. If not, people would not voluntarily follow the rules and regulations and would break them if possible. This would therefore act as a deterrent, meaning people avoid repeating the same offense. Another justification is that the driver can have their driver's license revoked, license suspended, a driver awareness course and even jail time. While these measures may affect drivers, for example drivers will lose their jobs, or affect their jobs, it will reduce accidents. The purpose of these penalties is to show dangerous drivers that their actions have negative consequences. Therefore, we hope that drivers should be more disciplined and alert, and obey the rules more carefully.
Notwithstanding some critics’ objections, some support the view that safe driving can be promoted in a variety of ways without punishing the driver. First and foremost, the government can pay more attention to safe road design. The government has to make some traffic-calming measures, such as putting more signs to warn people, building speed bumps and bends in the road can be added to stabilize traffic, and in addition paved curbs to avoid vehicles on the sidewalk, causing accidents for pedestrians. It should be also noted that properly educating people before they start driving, and this can be done in school or even as part of a longer or more difficult driving test. In addition, it is possible to issue an official driver's license to them when they have been driving for 3 years with only 5 violations at most. And when they have been granted a driver's license, if they violate more than 2 times in a year, they can completely revoke the license.
In sum, while there are sensible reasons to believe that tough punishments can reduce car crashes, my view is that the government can combine both stiff sentences and other measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the kiwi animal 56
- Some people think that schools should teach enroll students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities skills studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the difference between boys and girls in the selection of subjects at higher education levels in Canada in the year 2009 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12303664921 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6989427232 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557591623037 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6446048175 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.117647059 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273924708656 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086496644592 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059214265574 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182388585511 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611411903331 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.