In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should have the responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed that the young generation has a poor standard of living makes their health worse. People believe that the government ought to be in charge of this situation. In my point of view, I think that they would have a strong impact on helping children improve their life as well.
In my opinion, the government should take responsibility for the health of its citizens, including children. Firstly, by implementing policies and programs that promote healthy lifestyles and education, the government can help deal with the issues of childhood obesity. For example, sport is made compulsory in Vietnamese public schools which gives younger people the best way to improve their physical health besides schoolwork. Secondly, it is also important to raise parents' awareness of children's health by organizing open-minded workshops, the government could improve the overall health of the population. Then, the adults not only make suitable nutrition for their family but also advise their kids the positive ways to enhance nutritious living.
In addition, there is potential for government investment in well-being development. By building multi-sport facilities, the local administration creates healthy playgrounds for young people to strengthen their resistance. In fact, in many developed countries, there are many sports centers that are open and free for teenagers encouraging them to develop their physical abilities. Furthermore, by broadening physical competition, the government gives children opportunities to experience and get better.
In conclusion, the government should take a leading role in addressing the unhealthy issues. So in my view, the government ought to invest national resources and be involved in promoting healthy habits and making suitable nutrition choices for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Bigk016 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | khlytran | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 84
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69485294118 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01459603458 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5698933046 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2142857143 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164387607364 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628598272135 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416887215856 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107180265744 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146969108015 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69485294118 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01459603458 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5698933046 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2142857143 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164387607364 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628598272135 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416887215856 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107180265744 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146969108015 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.