Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today, some argue that the environment and housing conditions have influenced people's well-being and the government should pay more attention to solving this issue than other aspects. However, I firmly disagree with this statement.
Indeed, numerous problems have come from environmental pollution and housing problems. For example, air pollution is a major issue in cities and consequently, many urban residents suffer from respiratory ailments and the lack of clean water is a circumstance that millions of people are facing now. Moreover, unhealthy surroundings create the conditions for bacteria or mosquitoes to breed. This leads to more and more diseases becoming apparent and affecting people’s well-being. If the authorities could support basic housing with a better position, they can avoid substantial risk of illness and disease.
On the contrary, while it is true that the reduction of the environment and housing problem play an important role in mitigating the crisis of ailments, simply focusing on this will not prevent all diseases. They ought to do much more. It has allocated a part of the budget to prevent ailments through vaccinations. It should also be spent on screening tests through which serious diseases such as cancer can be detected long before actual symptoms occur. These actions not only alleviate the number of patients but also careful preparation when an epidemic occurs.
In conclusion, although giving priority to environmental issues and housing will improve public health, it is significant to allocate budgets or have plantations to ensure that people live healthy and long lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | clly | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | clly | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Kimm2903 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | dhruv j patel | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | Sneha George | 56 | view |
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51394422311 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88028797045 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669322709163 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2052701698 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243144345029 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694954048014 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467554918009 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130359023367 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289927742404 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.