The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration gives information about the average differences in the cost of three materials which are copper, nickel, and zinc every month throughout the year 2014.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable downward trends in the selling price of copper, nickel, and zinc in the first half of the year. Then, their prices remain stable in the next three months after increasing sharply in the last period. Another interesting point is that Nikel had the highest price at the beginning but after twelve months, it was sold at the lowest price.
Look at the details, as regards Nikel, its payment rate started at 6 percent in January of 2014, and then the price hit the bottom at just -3 percent after 6 months. Having stayed unchanged at -1 percent over a three-month period from July to September, the figure then continued decreasing 1 percent to -2 percent in the next month. In the last two months of the year, the rate saw a dramatic increase to 1%, which is 3% higher than the price in October.
If we look at Copper, the trend was similar. The cost of Copper also plummeted from 2 percent at the beginning of the year to -0.5 percent in June. In the next three months, its data remained constant at -1 percent. After that, despite a negligible drop in October, the rate grew slightly to around 1 percent in both November and December, which is about three times higher than the figure one month ago.
As for the last metal, the price of Zinc reached its peak at 3 percent in just the first two months of the year and the figure then fell remarkably to -1 percent in June. There was a steep rise to 2 percent between November and December after a leveling off at nearly 0 percent from July to September.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification 89
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c every month throughout the year 2014. Overall, what stands out from the graph ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, then, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 315.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58095238095 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37083564972 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 106.607317073 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.349909007 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116997238918 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531343838226 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403708411344 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866600995477 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400588510204 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.