The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
The bar chart illustrates some information about the percentage of weekly income spending of each family in eight different groups in one country in 1968 and in 2018.
It is obvious that families who live in this country like to spent their weekly income in food group that has maximum percent among other groups in 1968 while the minimum percent related to fuel and power in this year.
As can be seen there are four groups that they have under 10 percent such as fuel and power, clothing and foot ware, household goods, and personal goods which people who spent their weekly income in 1968 are more than in 2018 except household goods that in 1968 and in 2018 has same percent. The increased of the transport group about 8 percent shows that people have tendency to use transport system in 2018 and this is true about leisure group that has approximately 12 percent increase in 2018, but people did not like to spend their income in food group and this item decrease about 18 percent in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 61
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61235955056 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14292522481 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7936008423 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 205.25 112.824112599 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336111824912 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235536654131 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111081699961 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274394553175 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107050870244 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.2 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.35 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.