Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In contemporary society, the prominence of creating appealing images often seems to overshadow the importance of truth and reality. This statement raises a valid concern, and I wholeheartedly agree with the notion that there are significant drawbacks to this trend. While it's essential to recognize that images can be a powerful means of communication and self-expression, the extent to which they have taken precedence over genuine substance and authenticity in today's world is a matter of concern.
One of the primary reasons why this trend is problematic is that it can contribute to a sense of inadequacy and dissatisfaction among individuals. With the advent of social media platforms, the dissemination of images portraying idealized versions of people's lives has become ubiquitous. These images often depict flawless beauty, extravagant lifestyles, and unattainable standards of success. As a result, many individuals, especially the younger generation, compare themselves to these fabricated images and feel inadequate by comparison. This can lead to a decline in self-esteem and mental health issues such as anxiety and depression.
Furthermore, the allure of appealing images can often obscure the realities of the world. People are bombarded with images that promote a shallow and materialistic perspective of life. For instance, the emphasis on perfect bodies and luxurious possessions in the media can lead individuals to prioritize superficial goals over more meaningful pursuits. The pursuit of materialism and physical perfection can leave people feeling unfulfilled and disconnected from the deeper aspects of life, such as personal growth, meaningful relationships, and intellectual pursuits.
Another aspect to consider is the impact of appealing images on the overall quality of information consumption. In the age of clickbait and sensationalism, content creators are incentivized to prioritize eye-catching visuals over substantive content. This can lead to a proliferation of misleading or shallow information, where the emphasis is on grabbing attention rather than providing valuable insights or knowledge. Consequently, society may become increasingly superficial and uninformed, as individuals prioritize the allure of images over the substance of information.
While it is crucial to acknowledge the negative aspects of the prominence of appealing images, it's important to recognize that not all images or forms of self-expression fall into this category. Visual communication can be a powerful tool for conveying emotions, telling stories, and sharing experiences. Moreover, images can serve as a means of artistic expression and cultural preservation.
In conclusion, the preeminence of appealing images over truth and reality in contemporary society poses significant challenges. It can lead to feelings of inadequacy, promote shallow values, and diminish the quality of information consumed. However, it's essential to strike a balance between appreciating the artistic and communicative potential of images while remaining critical consumers of the content we encounter. Encouraging a culture that values authenticity, substance, and genuine connections alongside appealing visuals is crucial for addressing the challenges posed by this trend.
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2818.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9577167019 5.05705443957 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43302495332 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53911205074 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.91904253 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.52173913 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206673647393 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623657121909 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599775066975 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110091507177 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440474512695 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.1639044944 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2818.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9577167019 5.05705443957 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43302495332 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53911205074 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.91904253 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.52173913 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206673647393 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623657121909 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599775066975 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110091507177 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440474512695 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.1639044944 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.