The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table compares two primary schools in terms of the proportions of their pupils who experienced seven different educational problems in the years 2005 and 2015.
It is noticeable that school A had larger proportions of children with all seven distinct educational difficulties in both years. While school A managed to reduce the incidence of most of the problems between 2005 and 2015, school B saw an overall rise in the proportion of children who were struggling.
In 2005, 42% of school A’s pupils found it difficult to follow instructions, whereas only 6% of children in school B experienced this problem. Similarly, between 30% and 40% of pupils attending school A had problems in the areas of spelling, listening, verbal expression, and concentration in lessons, while the equivalent figures for school B stood at from 5% to 15%.
In 2015, the difference between the two schools was less pronounced. Notably, the proportion of children who struggled to follow instructions decreased by 24% in school A, and this school saw falls of 22%, 15%, 14%, and 5% in the figures for children who had problems with concentration in lessons, listening, verbal expression, and spelling respectively. However, the number of students in school B struggling with spelling and following instructions doubled, to 10% and 12%. It seems that there was no change in the proportion of children who experienced difficulties in listening, verbal expression, and concentration in lessons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- In some countries more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this question 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below gives information about how families their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by make comparisons in one country spent selecting and reporting the main features and where relevant 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27118644068 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15067376733 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1854169559 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287180926501 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142758589801 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843181204726 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211673422543 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545269997344 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.