Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
I strongly believe technolgy provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with others. while it reduced direct face-to-face communication, it significantly increased indirect interaction in modern society.
Admittedly, it is true that technology played significant role reducing face-to-face communication. When there were no other means to communicate except meeting people in person, individuals had to meet people directly. For instance, all school courses were consist of in-person classes instead of online classes as these days. Because there were no options to communicate, direct human interaction was inevitable.
However, in a view of human interaction, indirect communication is also broader a valid type of interaction, and technology enabled us to connect with others through internet. In a contemporary world, we are always connected through social media, e-mail, and plenty of other platforms. On these online platforms, individuals make enormous human connection such as live streaming on Instagram, video call with friends who lives in different country, and some even fight on comment section of news articles. such cases demonstrate how technology rather enhanced our opportunity for human interation with diverse means.
In conclusion, while in-person, direct human interaction may have been decreased becasue of technology, it definately increased different shapes of human interaction, and enabled us to connect one another regardless of their location. In this regard, technology plays pivotal role increasing human interaction of modern society.
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 33
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...to communicate and connect with others. while it reduced direct face-to-face communic...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
.... For instance, all school courses were consist of in-person classes instead of online ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ht on comment section of news articles. such cases demonstrate how technology rather...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 230.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97391304348 5.05705443957 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16193092641 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6722024757 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411818477701 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130078263876 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911647116262 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223701965461 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699059476702 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.1639044944 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.