The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040.
Given are the line graphs contrasting the rate of people living in urban and rural areas as well as in different age groups commencing from 1950 to 2020 and give projections to the year 2040.
Perceptibly, the figure of urban and rural dwellers is predicted to accumulate during the 10 10 years intervals, initiating from 1950 to 2040. Furthermore, the proportion of people in the 15-65 age group is likely to account for by far the largest figure among the others
As the information supplied from the first chart, the rate of citizens initiated at 7% and seemingly to accumulate to 38% in 2040 whereas there was an insignificant disproportion of 5% in the figure of urban dwellers from the year 1950 to 2020 and likely to continue to fluctuate at somewhere in the vicinity of the same rate. Transparently, the total rate of urban and rural population is expected to undergo a drastic accrual.
When it comes to the second graph, the figure for the under 15 age group escalated to 5% in 1960 which was in inverse proportion to the rate of the over 65 age group receded in the same year to 1.5% due to both initiating at 2.5%. In the next interval, the figure of these age groups converged at around 4% in 1980 and this figure almost remained unchanged in the following years and seemingly to end at nearly 6% in 2040. In the interim, the opposite pattern was recorded in the rate of the 15-65 age group, which witnessed a ceaseless leap from 7% to 32% in the first 70 years, however, the year 2040 is expected to bring a modest appreciation of 3%.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the line graphs contrasting the rate of...
^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 10
...s is predicted to accumulate during the 10 10 years intervals, initiating from 1950 t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... far the largest figure among the others As the information supplied from the fir...
^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... expected to undergo a drastic accrual. When it comes to the second graph, the f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54285714286 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67519787557 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.746906164 43.030603864 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.714285714 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330123624642 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176099030929 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853491058715 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233988878621 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801678790899 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the line graphs contrasting the rate of...
^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 10
...s is predicted to accumulate during the 10 10 years intervals, initiating from 1950 t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... far the largest figure among the others As the information supplied from the fir...
^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... expected to undergo a drastic accrual. When it comes to the second graph, the f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54285714286 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67519787557 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.746906164 43.030603864 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.714285714 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330123624642 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176099030929 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853491058715 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233988878621 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801678790899 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.