The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart gives some information about the number of households in five distinct groups of annual income in the United States in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
In general, most of annually income groups have a fluctuation trend except one which did not change in these three years. The peak was in 2015 and related to maximum revenue.
As can be seen, people of society who got income less than 25000 million has a fluctuated trend in 2007, 2011 and 2015 the number of households ordered about 25, 28 and 26 million similarity in 25000-49999$ after that increased around 5 million to 30 million decreased 3 million in 2015. There was a same trend in 75000-99999$ during these years. In 2007 the number of households was under 15 million after that raised and reached to 15 million in 2015. Although did not have any change in 50000-74999$ until 2015, the peak related to families who gain 100000 or more income more than 34 million.
As a result, the most of people have income 100000$ or more except in 2011 and the minimum number of salaries was 75000-99999$.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...more than 34 million. As a result, the most of people have income 100000$ or more except in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100000'.
Suggestion: $100000
... result, the most of people have income 100000$ or more except in 2011 and the minimum ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67914438503 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48984324751 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2380941996 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199453973256 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952337669314 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083595752703 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145452455718 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881731718431 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.