The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of average monthly price change in three distinct metals in 2014.
It is obvious that, there was a downward trend in Nickel and other two metals have a fluctuated trend during 2014.
As can be seen, the price of nickel decreased about 5 percent in two first months from 6 and unchanged in May and August then drop again. In June reached the minimum price by about 4 percent fall after that increased until -1 and was stable three consecutive months and decline. There was a 3 percent raise sharply in two last months and has a stable price remain two months during 2014. Copper’s price decreased slightly in first five months around 3 percent and did not change for 2 months then increased 1 percent and kept its average price for 3 months and for two months and in last moth raised more than 1 percent. Whereas zinc price surge by 2 percent in first month and then dropped until June to 4 percent after a few increased and did not change in three consecutive months its price back to their four months ago place. In three last months has soared slightly.
As a result, at the end of year all three metals have approximately same price.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The map below shows the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, so, then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54205607477 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31764395262 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7615762925 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253337303327 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13790714268 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790405389963 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182961168679 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100254365532 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, so, then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54205607477 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31764395262 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7615762925 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253337303327 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13790714268 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790405389963 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182961168679 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100254365532 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.