Nowadays, celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Recently, eminences constantly acquire a greater amount of income than their counterparts in legislative service. This disparity can be explained by some compelling rationales. I firmly believe that this progression is beneficial since it could promote the culture of a nation and secure the integrity of politicians.
The difference in incomes earned by eminent people and politicians may stem from the proliferation of the Internet and the salary structure. Firstly, the advancement of information technology successfully presents more opportunities for public figures to improve their salary levels. Thanks to the high accessibility of social media, advertisements using celebrities' images have been gaining traction and are given precedence by many manufacturers, which assists those engaged in earning more income. Another valid factor that gives rise to such a phenomenon is the flexibility of income resources. In other words, while renowned individuals are facilitated to earn money through diverse channels such as participating in public events or launching amusing products, a majority of politicians are offered a fixed salary initially. Consequently, the earning rates of personages could be controlled by their dedication which is wholly opposite in parallel with those working in politics.
Objectively, this discrepancy can be deemed advantageous considering several valid factors. Given the nature of their work, those who participate in political aspects are required to be completely honest and not influenced by financial motivation. Therefore, issuing a fixed level of salary for this group could prevent them from considering money as the driving force behind their unwavering commitment to work. Furthermore, by virtue of the cultural values that celebrities created, it stands to reason why they should usually have a comparative income. To be more specific, it is worth noting that celebrities do facilitate cultural diplomacy with their worldwide recognition. For instance, K-pop music bands have spread their cultures through many global music tours, which benefit not only the entertainment industry but also the popularity of that country’s culture.
In conclusion, the disparity in incomes of celebrities and politicians could be attributed to the salary structure and the development of social media. As a result, due to the security of honesty in politics and contribution to cultural integration, this progression should be highly encouraged
- Some parents send their children to preschool when they are three or four years old Other parents wait until their children are old enough for primary school before they send them to school Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sending children to p 72
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- the table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nced by financial motivation. Therefore, issuing a fixed level of salary for this...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79781420765 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20724995407 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4062496328 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.823529412 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202637446686 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579320327291 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338081634879 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114219727512 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273963079744 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.