The table shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
The following graph illustrates how much oil was produced every day by 4 distinct nations in a period of 5 years between 2000 and 2004.
Overall, there was an increase in the amount of oil produced by Nigeria, Chad and Somalia while the figure for Congo witnessed a significant decrease. Although Nigeria did not have the highest figure throughout the period, it surpassed Congo to reach the top at the final year (2004).
The amount of oil production of Congo started at 275,000 barrels per day (BPD), after which it significantly dropped to 203,000 BPD at the end of the period. However, opposite change can be seen in the figure for Nigeria, which rose from 205,000 BPD to 213,000 BDP and surpassed Congo to reach the top at the final year mentioned.
5,000 BPD were produced by Somalia, with a subsequent ten-time increase to 50,000 BPD in 2004. In the meantime, the figure for Chad was at 0 BPD followed by a dramatic incline to reach the same figure for Somalia at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61016949153 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51461304206 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6147865661 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097313727484 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052972052512 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404382224461 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719897684192 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422922873602 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.