The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is often suggested that science should be dedicated to enhancing the living experience of individuals. I disagree with this statement because people are not the only inhabitants of the Earth and the good of the natural environments should also be addressed by scientific research. Furthermore, studying the factors that could benefit the environment may result in future enhancements of human lives as well, serving both purposes.
To elaborate, it may be argued that the preservation of wildlife and ecosystems ought to be prioritized by empirical research because long-term access to natural resources may be more vital than short-term increases in people’s quality of life. Specifically, excessive research into enhancing individuals’ experiences throughout their daily life may lead to negative outcomes for the nature. For example, studying land cultivation contributes to life quality by speeding up food production for the population. However, this result may be achieved through over-cultivation and deforestation, which ultimately could endanger the planet.
Additionally, if scientific resources were to be directed toward green causes, it could lead to long-term life improvements, fulfilling both human-centered and nature-centered purposes. Precisely, allocating sufficient funds toward discovering sustainable ways of nature-human co-existence may not contribute to short-term convenience of individuals, but it could ensure the maintenance of the planet and pleasant experiences for future generations. For instance, while spending research budget on green energies instead of artificial intelligence could postpone the availability of virtual assistants, it might allow for a cleaner and less polluted air for the future.
In conclusion, I am against the notion that the priority of scientific inquiry should be people and their life quality, because focusing on the environment, taking care of other inhabitants of the Earth, and looking into the future may prove to be more worthwhile contributions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopled'?
Suggestion: peopled
...riority of scientific inquiry should be people and their life quality, because focusin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94197952218 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41354943875 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0216545498 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.272727273 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144548046897 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656555404538 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493261751991 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977957801095 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504935613759 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.