In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Within the free market of capitalist systems, the novelty of products is the driving deriving force of marketing and sales, with companies spending significant amounts of money on product presentations, optics, and promises of changing the world. A fundamental reason for this organizational behavior may be the abundance of profits gained from being or pretending to be innovative. I regard this development as mostly negative due to its environmental and ethical consequences.
Regarding the reason for novelty-centered advertisments, it may be best to touch on the tendency of novelty-seeking that exists within many cultures. Individuals, specially those within individualistic cultures, tend to enjoy accessing new materials, as it provides them with a pleasant gratification. While this trait has been at the root of valuable inventions, it has the potential to be misused by big companies, because they can capitalize on this desire to advertise their products in a way that makes them difficult to resist. For example, tech companies regularly rely on this tactic by introducing minimal changes to an old product but showcasing it as a cutting-edge new device.
This development comes with certain consequences. To advertise new products, companies should dedicate considerable parts of their budget to actually manufacturing new products. Excessive investing on novelty means that not enough funds are being directed toward preservation, specially environmental preservation. Production process utilizes the earth’s resources and is a main cause of Earth pollution, but gives little back toward its maintainance. Furthermore, the desire for being the first company to produce a new good results in disregard for potential moral consequences with regard to not only the earth, but also the people. For example, advancements in artificial intelligence, although quite fascinating, not only require a substantial amount of energy, but also bring up moral questions, such as the issues regarding its impact on the economy and unemployment.
In conclusion, allowing for individuals’ creativity and passion for innovation to flourish is positive in essence, but negative outcomes are also expected. Therefore, appropriate legal frameworks are essential to regulate businesses’ attempts to take advantage of this human tendency.
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and incl 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 527, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'result'?
Suggestion: result
...the first company to produce a new good results in disregard for potential moral conseq...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77456647399 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4253469075 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0422047591 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189886977319 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612310653615 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351318206524 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113436514932 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132473099461 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.