Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world. To what extent is this a positive or negative trend?
Government food strategies are designed to fulfill various supply chain needs. In recent years, food importing has sparked a debate among societies. While many people argue that importing food can be beneficial, I contend that being a customer of other countries is not only unwise but also can threaten other related fields.
To begin with, importing food from other parts of the world has several advantages. First and foremost, it allows countries to access a wider variety of food products that may not be locally available. Consumers, therefore, can enjoy experiencing diverse cuisines and new flavors. Moreover, seasonal gaps in production may lead to supply disruptions. Importing food, therefore, can compensate for food scarcity and price fluctuations throughout the year and ensure a more consistent supply.
However, certain challenges and drawbacks emerge if food importation contributes to a large portion of food supply. The food and agriculture industry obviously needs meticulous planning. Sole reliance on food importation can make agriculture and its relevant subsections vulnerable. In other words, governments may not feel the necessity of investing in this industry and promoting new methods in harvesting, cultivation, and aggregation, for example, which may consequently lead to a gradual downward trend in food production and the vanishing of related professions. Thus, the economy can be heavily influenced if the government denies endeavors for developing and becoming independent in the food and agriculture industry.
In conclusion, cross-border food business has its own advantages and disadvantages. While it can rectify some problems such as unsteady supply and unavailability of certain foods, agricultural and economic downsides that it brings along should be considered. I believe that the demerits of importing food can outweigh the merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Koi | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Luisjackiet | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Luisjackiet | 61 | view |
- Some countries invest in specialized sports facilities for top athletes but not for the average people Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three years old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals To what extend do you think crime is determined by human nature Is it possible to stop children from going up to be crim 84
- In many countries people now wear western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some believe it is more important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78214285714 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13503694279 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.906138454 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252918716156 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861030279692 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074199534174 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153145026688 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391758224779 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78214285714 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13503694279 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.906138454 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252918716156 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861030279692 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074199534174 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153145026688 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391758224779 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.