The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two figures illustrate the total police budget in a specific area of Britain in two years 2017 and 2018. Specifically, the table gives information on the origin of the money, whereas the pie chart demonstrates the way it was allocated.
Overall, in both 2017 and 2018, the allocation mostly came from the national government and was spent on the salaries of officers and staff more than on technology and buildings and transport.
Regarding the table, the national government contributed the most to the total financial plans of the region, with over 175 million euros in 2017 and 2018. It was observed that the budget coming from local taxes witnessed an upward trend, increasing from 91.2 million to nearly 102 million euros. Similarly, the figure for the other sources, including grants, increased from 38 million to 38.5 million euros.
Turning to the pie chart, roughly 70% of the allocation was utilized for the salaries of officers and staff. While the figure spent on buildings and transport did not change throughout the period, at 17%, it was technology that experienced a small increase in the spending of the government, from 8% in 2017 to 14% in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Plan A shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67594137157 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4391172439 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243831382337 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105874176801 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669501349677 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153076174989 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090579027854 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.