The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The bar chart presents data on the production and consumption of electricity, measured in billions of kilowatt-hours (kWh), across ten countries in the year 2014.
It is evident from the chart that China was the predominant producer and consumer of electricity, with figures exceeding 5,300 billion kWh. This was significantly higher than in the United States, which produced nearly 4,100 billion kWh and consumed approximately 3,900 billion kWh, securing the second position in both categories.
In contrast, the other eight countries demonstrated considerably lower levels of electricity production and consumption. France, Brazil, Germany, and the Republic of Korea showed similar outputs and usages, ranging from 485 to 560 billion kWh. Russia and Japan were notable for their production, each contributing around 1,000 billion kWh, positioning them just behind the United States.
India and Canada, while still among the top ten, had lower production and consumption rates, with India generating between 500 and 870 billion kWh and Canada slightly less. These figures indicate a diverse range of electricity usage patterns, reflecting varying levels of industrialization and population sizes.
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 89
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Today TV channels show more men s sports than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time to women s sports and men s sports 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80790960452 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01788004852 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689265536723 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4064910262 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.333333333 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224770272072 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119974862707 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104967245975 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150435470688 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112134082764 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.01 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.