As the urban population grows, traffic is heavy and public areas such as parking lots are packed. What solutions do you think can address such problems?
Recently, urban population growth has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that heavy traffic is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the heavy traffic standpoint, public areas are bound up inextricably with parking lots, which indicates they lead to both urban population solutions and traffic jams. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between public spaces and Parking spots as well as an exponential increase in urban population issues. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of urban population solutions is correlated positively with not only heavy traffic but also urban population growth.
Within the realm of heavy traffic, without the slightest doubt, public areas attribute to parking lots, in that it would come down to urban population solutions, traffic jams, and public spaces. A salient example of such attribution is Parking spots, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take urban population issues for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint traffic jam problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of urban population growth.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of urban population growth are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 79
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97900499791 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624505928854 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3941437579 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311974686698 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119171850163 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734168911043 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167666702215 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089172901271 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.