The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts represent the decisions of two groups of UK students, namely graduates and postgraduates, after graduating from university in 2008. Those who had a full-time job were not being recorded in the charts.
Overall, both groups chose further study as their next destination, which is the most common choice after leaving college, whereas voluntary work was the least common destination among the students.
Specifically, nearly 30000 graduate students continued studying further, which outnumbered the other group, who shared the same situation but with a moderate number of under 3000 students. In contrast, only 3500 graduates decided to do volunteer work after finishing their university degree, marking this as the least common of the four categories. This number of postgraduate students was respectively lower than 10 times their counterparts, which was 345 students. The number of graduate students who worked part-time and who were unemployed are quite similar, with 17735 and 16235 respectively. For postgraduates, those who did part-time were around 2535 students, which is the second option, just behind further studies. The unemployment rate for this group was low, in comparison to the other group, with only 1625 students who did not have a job after obtaining their higher degree.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 47
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 73
- The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48514851485 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85117572579 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2184077648 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211804276533 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949052958726 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349021735945 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138132398616 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591995172447 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.