The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts depict the expenditures in 5 sectors in two Asian countries Japan and Malaysia.
From an overall perspective, it is clear that residents in both countries spend a large portion of their income on housing, food, and transport except for transport and healthcare.
The largest percentage is the money spent on housing in Malaysia, with over one-third (34%) while the figure for Japan is noticeably smaller, at only 24%. Similarly, the expenditure on food in the former nation also outstrips that of the latter by 27% and 24% respectively.
However, Japan surpasses Malaysia when it comes to spending on the others. Particularly, other goods and services represent up to 29% of Japanese income compared to a slightly lower portion of 26% by Malaysians. Most strikingly, the transportation expense in this nation makes up one-fifth, doubling that of the Southeast Asian country, with 20% as opposed to 10%. Being the least important sector, health care occupies a tiny minority / receives an insufficient amount of investment in both countries with 6% in Japan. Whereas, the figure for Malaysia is only half as high.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows how to build a teepee Summarise the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table shows the proportion of female and male aged 15 and aged 75 from 1961 to 2011 in the UK 89
- Some people say in order to prevent illness government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure for Malaysia is only half as high.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95347809286 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5580523557 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125400410578 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564389150138 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522527235938 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880578612358 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562963771188 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.