The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports.
The bar chart illustrates the interest of British towards different sports being surveyed from 1995 to 2005
Overall, jogging was the most popular sport in over 3 years, the opposite was true for golf. It is clear that the proportion of people jogging had an upward trend, while other sports fluctuated over the periods. Moreover, the figure for swim and rugby had the same data over the periods.
In 1995, the rate of British went for a walk ranked the first position with over 40%, compared to the figure for snooker, only 30%. Following 5 years, the number of people jogging increased slightly to 42% and the hit the highest point with 45% in the end of the period. Meanwhile, the percentage of snooker experienced a fluctuated trend, it decreased significantly to 21% and then rose to around 24% in 2005. Tennis became the third popular sport with 27% people do this sport in 1995, the figure for tennis decreased to 24% in 2000 and then remained unchanged in 2005.
Looking at other sports, the percentage of people swimming also showed a fluctuated trend, it reached around 24% in 1995, then it increased sharply to 27% over 5 years and declined to 25% in 2005. The number of people love rugby also showed the same figure and trend with those loving swimming. Golf was the least popular sport, which reached 15% in 1995. The number of people take this sport declined slightly by around 3% in 2000 and then rose to 14% at the end of the period.
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The chart below illustrates the percentages of sales of one bookseller in 1970 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 84
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63953488372 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32567506271 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2767349029 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140708761453 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055970727919 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455182547113 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107117235835 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056996688794 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.